 |
| Justin Smeja passed a polygraph test |
- The documentary directed yesteryear Ro Sahebi
- The seventeen questions/answers/results published inwards the examiner's report. Original documents at Bigfoot Evidence
- And thence the answers to the iii questions I asked Bart, Shawn, Ro too Carl. What was your role? What does this hateful to the Bigfoot Community? And, What does this hateful to you lot personally?
1) In belatedly Oct 2010, at the site you lot brought for a "body Search" inwards July 2011, did you lot direct burn downward on ii animals; 1 adult too what you lot believe 1 juvenile of a species others would logically term equally BIGFOOTS" or "SASQUATCHES"?(The monastic enjoin of the the interviews below are inwards the same monastic enjoin each was introduced to Justin Smeja)
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
2) Was the showtime shot fired on-site, a direct hitting to a bipedal animate existence you lot conduct maintain never seen before?
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
3) When you lot showtime saw this "animal", did you lot recognize it equally a species you lot had never seen earlier or fifty-fifty knew existed?
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
4) Did you lot meet ii animals that you lot believed were relative juveniles of the adult discipline you lot shot?
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
5) Did You shoot too fatally injure a juvenille "animal" that appeared to endure a species that you lot conduct maintain never seen earlier or ever knew fifty-fifty existed
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
6) Did you lot or Jack halt too buy cigareetes inwards Sierra City on your agency abode after the "Sierra Kills" shootings?
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
7) Are all of the statements you lot are making inwards regards to you lot shooting ii bipedal primates, which incident is instantly existence called the "Sierra Kills", true?
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
8) Is this entire "Sierra Kills" story a Hoax
Answer: No Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
9) Would at that topographic point endure or practise you lot conduct maintain whatever argue why you lot would "make-up" or lie, near statements you lot conduct maintain claimed to endure truthful inwards regards to the "Sierra Kills"?
Answer: No Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
10) After conversing amongst Derek Randles, were you lot excited too confident near returning to the shooting site to succesfully collect the remains odf the juvenile discipline killed, for monetary reward?
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
11) Were you lot frustrated near non existence able to to locate the carcass on your showtime furnish trip to the site?
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
12) Do you lot genuinely beliueve that the slice of flesh you lot conduct maintain processed, cutting into pieces, too sent to diverse lab, is a slice of flesh from the unidentified animate existence you lot claimed to conduct maintain shot from the "Sierra Kills" incident?
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
13) Is the slice of flesh given to Wally [Redacted] from the same beginning equally the slice of flesh you lot were instructed to mail to a [redacted] lab yesteryear bart Curtino?
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
14) has the Department of Fish & game taken involvement inwards this "Sierra Kills" incident too questioned you lot on several ocassions?
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
15) Do the creative somebody renditions accurately depict the animals that you lot shot inwards the "Sierra Kills"?
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
16) After the shootings of these foreign animals, did the Department of Fish & Game exhibit upward at your house?
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
17) Did the foreign animals you lot shot inwards the "Sierra Kill" incident, hold off similar a large human dressed inwards a demeanour suit?
Answer: Yes Test Result: Passed NO DECEPTION INDICATED
My journeying into internally investigating this "Sierra Kills" trial began inwards July of 2011 at our "body/remains recovery effort" orchestrated yesteryear my dandy friend too researcher, Derek Randles, too has carried through today, partnering amongst Tyler Huggins too Justin to initiate independent testing of both the circumstantial (tissue) & non-circumstantial (boots) evidence retrieved from this event. In that time, I've gone from initially believing this trial was sure as shooting a hoax (with roughly curious aspects) to instantly believing strongly the trial happened equally described yesteryear "both" witnesses consistent too unwavering accounts.
What practise these results hateful for Bigfoot enquiry inwards general?
In regards to how we, the proverbial "bigfoot enquiry community," should perceive the results of Justin's polygraph, I think nosotros should abide by the fact that the atomic number 82 witness inwards arguably the most unprecedented trial claim inwards the history of the subject, aside from the Patterson/Gimlin film, had the courage to follow through too move yesteryear a pregnant challenge to his assertions that he's responsible for having shot ii sasquatches on a belatedly afternoon, inwards Oct of 2010 inwards the CA, Sierras. At the same time, nosotros should recognize & abide by roughly of the limitations too contentions of the medium used (polygraph) too proceed appropriate "perspective," reserving sentence for the diagnostic testing too determinations (for both "circumstantial" & "non-circumstantial" evidence) currently taking house inwards multiple labs too now, initiated yesteryear multiple parties. I think other positives nosotros tin accept from this completed polygraph procedure equally researchers amongst shared a destination of "discovery," is that although nosotros may stand upward for dissimilar organizations (Ro amongst Team Tazer & myself amongst BFRO, AIBR & The Olympic Project) nosotros tin collaborate & move together yesteryear raising the touchstone too providing much needed transparency to this field.
What practise these results hateful to you lot personally?
With all evidence currently existence processed at multiple North American labs, I was admittedly tentative on Justin's behalf regarding him taking a polygraph at this fourth dimension equally I felt at that topographic point was really piffling to gain yesteryear perception too much to lose inwards the agency of to a greater extent than hardships for him too his family. However, Ro was really proactive inwards initiating this procedure too requesting my aid amongst the questioning because of the intimate cognition I had internally too Justin insisting he ever wanted this opportunity. With the assistance of Tyler Huggins (BFRO), nosotros formulated questions that weren't meant to protect Justin, they were meant to choose handgrip of him existence deceptive equally nosotros are nether no illusion that for this procedure to conduct maintain whatever objective value it needed to endure completely unbiased too amongst an emphasis on transparency. Although I preach "perspective" amongst the agreement from my collegiate background too sense that polygraph examinations are non 100% foolproof, come upward highly contended too are used primarily yesteryear police enforcement to elicit confessions out of suspects, I'm really proud of Justin for both his amount cooperation inwards the final yr too courage to measuring forrad too clear his shout out at whatever cost. Based on my familiarity amongst polygraphs, the sense of a reputable examiner, the machine too questions used, too amongst consideration how good I know Justin on a personal level, I'd endure lying if I said I idea he could trounce this seek lying. The truthful seek instantly volition come upward inwards the shape of determinations from highly reputable diagnostic labs too their directors.....nothing to hide... allow the chips autumn where they may.
SHAWN EVIDENCE
RO SAHEBIWhat was your role?
My project is to tell Justin's story. It's the most fascinating story I've ever heard. No thing how this ends, or how much of it you lot believe, the story is incredible. In the Bigfoot world, people desire content, too there's non plenty expert novel content out there. I'm simply trying to create amount inwards a piffling flake of that huge hole.
What practise these results hateful for Bigfoot enquiry inwards general?
The results are of import to those who sympathize the whole situation. To most, the polygraph yesteryear itself, is non much. Now if the deoxyribonucleic acid study come upward up amongst something too you lot heed to the drivers story, thence add together credible players similar Bart Cutino, James Bobo Faye, too Derek Randles to the situation... you lot start larn something. Sure none of it is definitive, but at the really least, you lot conduct maintain to halt too accept a look.
What practise these results hateful to you lot personally?
The results were the icing on the cake. I had started to pass a lot of fourth dimension talking to the players involved too it like shooting fish in a barrel changed my thought on the situation. Before the polygraph seek took place, I had already told Justin that I believed him. The problem, it is a difficult story to defend. So this simply gives me a piffling flake to a greater extent than ammo to combat with.
With all evidence currently existence processed at multiple North American labs, I was admittedly tentative on Justin's behalf regarding him taking a polygraph at this fourth dimension equally I felt at that topographic point was really piffling to gain yesteryear perception too much to lose inwards the agency of to a greater extent than hardships for him too his family. However, Ro was really proactive inwards initiating this procedure too requesting my aid amongst the questioning because of the intimate cognition I had internally too Justin insisting he ever wanted this opportunity. With the assistance of Tyler Huggins (BFRO), nosotros formulated questions that weren't meant to protect Justin, they were meant to choose handgrip of him existence deceptive equally nosotros are nether no illusion that for this procedure to conduct maintain whatever objective value it needed to endure completely unbiased too amongst an emphasis on transparency. Although I preach "perspective" amongst the agreement from my collegiate background too sense that polygraph examinations are non 100% foolproof, come upward highly contended too are used primarily yesteryear police enforcement to elicit confessions out of suspects, I'm really proud of Justin for both his amount cooperation inwards the final yr too courage to measuring forrad too clear his shout out at whatever cost. Based on my familiarity amongst polygraphs, the sense of a reputable examiner, the machine too questions used, too amongst consideration how good I know Justin on a personal level, I'd endure lying if I said I idea he could trounce this seek lying. The truthful seek instantly volition come upward inwards the shape of determinations from highly reputable diagnostic labs too their directors.....nothing to hide... allow the chips autumn where they may.
What was your role?
When I went out to the Sierra Kills site amongst Ro Sahebi, Carl Olinselot, Nadia Moore, David Badorf, too Justin Smeja, I didn't genuinely sympathize what my role was until nosotros were really there. I was at that topographic point equally a journalist too it felt expert to purpose of something that could peradventure plow the basis upside down.
What practise these results hateful for Bigfoot enquiry inwards general?
The polygraph results volition aid movement the give-and-take forward, too hopefully take away roughly of the doubts people conduct maintain near Justin's story. He has been equally opened upward equally he can, too I believe he's existence honest near what happened inwards Oct 2010.
What practise these results hateful to you lot personally?
I started to befriend Justin Smeja to reckon who he's really similar equally a person. I conduct maintain visited him at his abode numerous times too each time, I larn blown away yesteryear his honesty. He has been extremely opened upward too forthcoming near everything that I conduct maintain asked. For example, when I asked to reckon a slice of the Bigfoot tissue inwards his freezer, he had no problems amongst it. Honestly, I don't know what else a guy tin practise to show to that he's telling us the truth. I'm at the dot instantly that I really conduct maintain no selection but to believe the guy.
Do I believe inwards Bigfoot? Yes. If I'm going to believe Justin, I conduct maintain to believe that at that topographic point is a bipedal hominid lurking inwards our woods.
My project is to tell Justin's story. It's the most fascinating story I've ever heard. No thing how this ends, or how much of it you lot believe, the story is incredible. In the Bigfoot world, people desire content, too there's non plenty expert novel content out there. I'm simply trying to create amount inwards a piffling flake of that huge hole.
What practise these results hateful for Bigfoot enquiry inwards general?
The results are of import to those who sympathize the whole situation. To most, the polygraph yesteryear itself, is non much. Now if the deoxyribonucleic acid study come upward up amongst something too you lot heed to the drivers story, thence add together credible players similar Bart Cutino, James Bobo Faye, too Derek Randles to the situation... you lot start larn something. Sure none of it is definitive, but at the really least, you lot conduct maintain to halt too accept a look.
What practise these results hateful to you lot personally?
The results were the icing on the cake. I had started to pass a lot of fourth dimension talking to the players involved too it like shooting fish in a barrel changed my thought on the situation. Before the polygraph seek took place, I had already told Justin that I believed him. The problem, it is a difficult story to defend. So this simply gives me a piffling flake to a greater extent than ammo to combat with.
CARL OLINSELOT
What was your role?
What was your role?
My role on this trip was to assist Ro Sahebi inwards the filming too documenting equally both a cameraman too organizer. My project was to cinema all the behind the scenes footage. When Ro's photographic telly camera was turned off my photographic telly camera would plow on. I recorded the casual moments inwards betwixt the polygraph, earlier too after, the conversations near when to release the results, too everything that was non a structured purpose of the documentary but nevertheless of import to sympathize how events inwards betwixt occurred. I also assisted inwards paying for the polygraph, coming upward amongst the phrasing of questions for the polygraph, too overall simply assisting Ro amongst equipment, charging batteries too anything that needed done.
What practise these results hateful for Bigfoot enquiry inwards general?
For the people who already know the existence of Sasquatch it volition solely reinforce their confidence too resolve to practise fact based research. For the skeptics it likely won't hateful anything. People are prone to non trust polygraph results too that's fine, but it is a shift from the typical bigfoot "research" where someone tells a story amongst no evidence. The polygraph focuses on to a greater extent than objective too fact based results rather than simply taking a persons tidings for it - too that's a major step.
What practise these results hateful to you lot personally?
For me personally I was really skeptical near Justin's story. After talking amongst him too spending fourth dimension amongst him I was much to a greater extent than convinced he was telling the truth earlier the polygraph. Knowing that he had no fourth dimension to gear upward for a polygraph too that many of the questions were added simply minutes earlier the seek was administered added to the credibility too greatly reduced the chances of Justin existence able to prevarication his agency through one. After passing the seek too discussing the results amongst the Polygraph administrator I was 90% sure that Justin is telling the truth. His reaction to existence told he was taking a seek too his reaction to having passed the test. Being at that topographic point to witness these events too thence having him move yesteryear completely was potent confirmation that Justin too the driver are telling the truth near the events of that day.
We would similar to give thank you lot Bart Cutino, Ro Sahebi, Shawn Evidence too Carl Olinselot for providing their perspective. Stay tuned subsequently this afternoon equally nosotros issue our interview amongst the examiner herself.
0 comments:
Post a Comment